A SYDNEY woman with less than two months to live has been awarded more than $400,000 after a government-funded breast examination failed to detect a malignant tumour. Christine O'Gorman is not expected to live beyond the end of the year after cancer in her left breast spread to her lungs and brain.
The 57-year-old from Moorebank had her breast removed, has undergone multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiation, and is now taking painkillers for her symptoms.
In the New South Wales Supreme Court today, Justin Clifton Hoeben awarded Ms O'Gorman $405,990 in damages and costs after she sued Sydney South West Area Health Service, which operates BreastScreen.
"(Ms O'Gorman) realises and is trying to come to terms with the fact that there is no hope of a cure and that she must live her life as best as she can between now and the end of December when medical opinion assesses that she will die," Justin Hoeben said in his judgment.
"Her final weeks will involve considerable pain and suffering."
Ms O'Gorman had undergone routine mammograms every two years from 1994 at BreastScreen – a free service funded by the Commonwealth and NSW Governments.
Daily Telegraph, 30 Oct 2008 Her 2002 and 2004 results detected a mass in her left breast, which reviewing doctors deemed had no suspicious features and had not increased in size between screenings.
She went for another screening in February 2006 and was not informed of any significant changes.
"I cannot, however, ignore my observation that on a simple visual comparison, the mass on the 2006 films appeared significantly larger than that of the 2004 films," Justice Hoeben said.
In early January 2007, Ms O'Gorman was on holiday when she scratched her left breast and notice a lump.
She was treated with chemotherapy to shrink the tumour before it was removed and continued the cancer treatment until the end of July.
In August, she underwent further tests that revealed she had cancer in her lungs, and a week later she had a mastectomy.
In June of this year, tumours were detected in her brain, prompting further chemotherapy.
"The plaintiff has become depressed and describes herself as being sad all the time. She cries easily," Justice Hoeben said.
"Although she tries to put on a brave face for her partner (Glen) and (daughter) Christie, she is finding it harder to do."
Justice Hoeben ruled that BreastScreen was negligent by failing to compare Ms O'Gorman's 2004 and 2006 mammogram results and by not recalling her for further tests after her 2006 screening.
She was awarded $247,500 for general damages with the remainder of the award comprising out-of-pocket costs and the estimated loss of past and future earnings.
He also ordered the area health service to pay her legal costs .
Article Source
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Busting breast cancer myths
Tall tales about what causes breast cancer can do more harm than good, writes Bronwyn McNulty.
Underwire bras, antiperspirants, big boobs and breastfeeding cause breast cancer. True or false? False. But the existence of these urban myths about breast cancer at least means women are talking about the disease.
Associate professor John Boyages, director of the NSW Breast Cancer Institute and spokesman for the National Breast Cancer Foundation, says 13,000 women are diagnosed with the disease in Australia each year, which means there is a high level of awareness.
Professor Michael Henderson, from Melbourne's Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, says: "Our mothers will tell you that in the 1940s, '50s and '60s, if a woman had breast cancer, the last thing she did was tell anyone."
The National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre says to be sceptical of information "not from recognised medical and scientific experts". Here we dispel some of the myths.
MYTH ONE
Having a family history of breast cancer means you will get the disease.
Most women who get breast cancer don't have a family history of the disease, Boyages says.
"Therefore, all women should think about their breast health," he says. "For women aged 50-69, that means going for regular mammograms. Call 132 050 for information about the free breast-screening program."
MYTH TWO
Breast cancer is a young woman's disease
With the public face of breast cancer featuring the young faces of Belinda Emmett, Jane McGrath, Kylie Minogue and Christina Applegate, you could be forgiven for thinking it's a young woman's disease. It's not.
"The data is quite strong," Henderson says. "In Australia we are not seeing an increase in young women [under 50] with breast cancer. The [most common] age is the late 50s and 60s."
MYTH THREE
Antiperspirants and underwire bras cause breast cancer
"These are urban myths that have been debunked many times," Henderson says. Boyages says:
"Breast cancer has been around since the ancient Egyptians and I don't think they had underwire bras."
MYTH FOUR
Freezing water in plastic, or microwave cooking with plastics releases cancer-causing toxins
One email doing the rounds warns of the dangers of the above and is attributed to the John Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Baltimore. John Hopkins has labelled the email a hoax.
"Freezing water does not cause the release of chemicals from plastic bottles," Boyages says. "And there are clear recommendations to only use microwave-safe containers. "
MYTH FIVE
Lumpy breasts increase your risk
Boyages says: "A lot of women get lumpier breasts before their period or may have cysts, which are common in the breast. Nine out of 10 lumps are not cancer. But if you have a lump that doesn't go away, have a triple test."
MYTH SIX
Small breasts reduce your risk
Breast size has nothing to do with the risk of breast cancer but Henderson says obese women, specifically women who are post-menopausal, have an increased risk.
MYTH SEVEN
Implants increase your risk of breast cancer
Silicon breast implants are not linked to breast cancer risk. The National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre reports that a large study on the long-term effects of implants followed women for more than 10 years and showed no increased risk.
Boyages says: "In some ways it's easier to find breast cancer, because the implant pushes the breast tissue forward."
MYTH EIGHT
Breast pain indicates breast cancer
Most breast cancers don't cause significant pain but a few do. "So you can't be complacent if a lump is painful," Boyages says. "In about 10 per cent of cases of breast cancer there is pain."
MYTH NINE
Nipple discharge indicates breast cancer
The majority of nipple discharge has nothing to do with cancer but Henderson says bloody discharges are a concern. "Even then, more often than not, it is not breast cancer," he says. Boyages says doctors will also be concerned by discharge that is coloured "like straw".
MYTH TEN
Mammograms cause breast cancer
Exposure to ionising radiation can cause cancer. However, given the limited number of mammograms a woman has in her lifetime and the standards of mammographic equipment in use in Australia, the increased radiation exposure from a mammogram is minimal, says the NBOCC.
"If you are 50 [and] having a mammogram every two years, the risk of radiation is far less than other risks we take every day," Boyages says.
However, having radiation for other cancers does increase your risk of breast cancer.
"If, for example, someone had Hodgkin's lymphoma as a teenager and had radiation treatment, they would be at much higher risk of breast cancer, so should start having mammograms 10 years after their initial treatment," Boyages says.
Readers can support breast cancer research by buying a pink ribbon on Pink Ribbon Day, which is October 27.
For more information:National Breast Cancer Foundation: nbcf.org.au; Breast Cancer Australia: breastcanceraustralia.org; National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre: nbocc.org.au; Breast Cancer Network Australia: bcna.org.au; Cancer Council Australia: cancer.org.au.
How to improve your breast health
See your doctor regularly
"If you have a lump, get it checked out with the triple test," Boyages says. "Make sure the GP follows the national guidelines for breast checks."
Be breast aware
Be aware of changes in your breasts and find out what your normal pattern is. "Perhaps your breasts are lumpy before you get your period," Boyages says. "If so, do the breast self-examination after your period."
Participate in national breast screening
This should be done once you turn 50, Henderson says, adding that "women aged 40-50, after discussion with their doctor, may consider screening at an earlier stage".
Maintain a healthy lifestyleIt's estimated that one-quarter of breast cancers are attributable to our lifestyle - particularly obesity, diet and lack of exercise - says Henderson.
Once you've had breast cancer, a moderate amount of exercise, getting weight down and reducing the fat in your diet may help to reduce the risk of breast cancer coming back," he says.
Drink in moderation
People who drink alcohol to excess may have a slightly higher risk of breast cancer. Moderation is the key.
Have good vitamin D levels
"There's some evidence that low vitamin D levels can increase the risk of breast cancer," Boyages says.
Article Source
Underwire bras, antiperspirants, big boobs and breastfeeding cause breast cancer. True or false? False. But the existence of these urban myths about breast cancer at least means women are talking about the disease.
Associate professor John Boyages, director of the NSW Breast Cancer Institute and spokesman for the National Breast Cancer Foundation, says 13,000 women are diagnosed with the disease in Australia each year, which means there is a high level of awareness.
Professor Michael Henderson, from Melbourne's Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, says: "Our mothers will tell you that in the 1940s, '50s and '60s, if a woman had breast cancer, the last thing she did was tell anyone."
The National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre says to be sceptical of information "not from recognised medical and scientific experts". Here we dispel some of the myths.
MYTH ONE
Having a family history of breast cancer means you will get the disease.
Most women who get breast cancer don't have a family history of the disease, Boyages says.
"Therefore, all women should think about their breast health," he says. "For women aged 50-69, that means going for regular mammograms. Call 132 050 for information about the free breast-screening program."
MYTH TWO
Breast cancer is a young woman's disease
With the public face of breast cancer featuring the young faces of Belinda Emmett, Jane McGrath, Kylie Minogue and Christina Applegate, you could be forgiven for thinking it's a young woman's disease. It's not.
"The data is quite strong," Henderson says. "In Australia we are not seeing an increase in young women [under 50] with breast cancer. The [most common] age is the late 50s and 60s."
MYTH THREE
Antiperspirants and underwire bras cause breast cancer
"These are urban myths that have been debunked many times," Henderson says. Boyages says:
"Breast cancer has been around since the ancient Egyptians and I don't think they had underwire bras."
MYTH FOUR
Freezing water in plastic, or microwave cooking with plastics releases cancer-causing toxins
One email doing the rounds warns of the dangers of the above and is attributed to the John Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Baltimore. John Hopkins has labelled the email a hoax.
"Freezing water does not cause the release of chemicals from plastic bottles," Boyages says. "And there are clear recommendations to only use microwave-safe containers. "
MYTH FIVE
Lumpy breasts increase your risk
Boyages says: "A lot of women get lumpier breasts before their period or may have cysts, which are common in the breast. Nine out of 10 lumps are not cancer. But if you have a lump that doesn't go away, have a triple test."
MYTH SIX
Small breasts reduce your risk
Breast size has nothing to do with the risk of breast cancer but Henderson says obese women, specifically women who are post-menopausal, have an increased risk.
MYTH SEVEN
Implants increase your risk of breast cancer
Silicon breast implants are not linked to breast cancer risk. The National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre reports that a large study on the long-term effects of implants followed women for more than 10 years and showed no increased risk.
Boyages says: "In some ways it's easier to find breast cancer, because the implant pushes the breast tissue forward."
MYTH EIGHT
Breast pain indicates breast cancer
Most breast cancers don't cause significant pain but a few do. "So you can't be complacent if a lump is painful," Boyages says. "In about 10 per cent of cases of breast cancer there is pain."
MYTH NINE
Nipple discharge indicates breast cancer
The majority of nipple discharge has nothing to do with cancer but Henderson says bloody discharges are a concern. "Even then, more often than not, it is not breast cancer," he says. Boyages says doctors will also be concerned by discharge that is coloured "like straw".
MYTH TEN
Mammograms cause breast cancer
Exposure to ionising radiation can cause cancer. However, given the limited number of mammograms a woman has in her lifetime and the standards of mammographic equipment in use in Australia, the increased radiation exposure from a mammogram is minimal, says the NBOCC.
"If you are 50 [and] having a mammogram every two years, the risk of radiation is far less than other risks we take every day," Boyages says.
However, having radiation for other cancers does increase your risk of breast cancer.
"If, for example, someone had Hodgkin's lymphoma as a teenager and had radiation treatment, they would be at much higher risk of breast cancer, so should start having mammograms 10 years after their initial treatment," Boyages says.
Readers can support breast cancer research by buying a pink ribbon on Pink Ribbon Day, which is October 27.
For more information:National Breast Cancer Foundation: nbcf.org.au; Breast Cancer Australia: breastcanceraustralia.org; National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre: nbocc.org.au; Breast Cancer Network Australia: bcna.org.au; Cancer Council Australia: cancer.org.au.
How to improve your breast health
See your doctor regularly
"If you have a lump, get it checked out with the triple test," Boyages says. "Make sure the GP follows the national guidelines for breast checks."
Be breast aware
Be aware of changes in your breasts and find out what your normal pattern is. "Perhaps your breasts are lumpy before you get your period," Boyages says. "If so, do the breast self-examination after your period."
Participate in national breast screening
This should be done once you turn 50, Henderson says, adding that "women aged 40-50, after discussion with their doctor, may consider screening at an earlier stage".
Maintain a healthy lifestyleIt's estimated that one-quarter of breast cancers are attributable to our lifestyle - particularly obesity, diet and lack of exercise - says Henderson.
Once you've had breast cancer, a moderate amount of exercise, getting weight down and reducing the fat in your diet may help to reduce the risk of breast cancer coming back," he says.
Drink in moderation
People who drink alcohol to excess may have a slightly higher risk of breast cancer. Moderation is the key.
Have good vitamin D levels
"There's some evidence that low vitamin D levels can increase the risk of breast cancer," Boyages says.
Article Source
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Sorting through the studies: breast cancer and diet
Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among Canadian women, accounting for about 30 per cent of all new cancer cases each year. One in 25 Canadian women will die from this disease and researchers are still not certain of the direct cause.
However, for the one in nine Canadian women who will develop breast cancer in their lifetime, nutrition research continues to find answers in the area of prevention and protection and also in tumor reduction.
Dr. Elaine Hardman, a researcher at Marshall's Joan Edward School of Medicine, says "we are beginning to understand that diet probably contributes to one-third to two thirds of all cancer that develops."
Breast tumour reduction
Medicine is increasingly looking at dietary changes as a way to reduce cancer tumours. In a current issue of Nutrition and Cancer, for example, it's reported that walnut consumption suppressed tumour growth in animals compared to those following a typical American diet.
Researchers found that a diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids had an effect on cancer growth, as tumours took twice as long to double in size as tumours in the control group.
When animals were fed a diet in which 18.5 per cent of the daily calories came from walnuts, the equivalent of two servings for humans, the growth rate of the tumours was dramatically reduced.
Researchers concluded that walnuts have at least three components that could account for their cancer-slowing effect: they are high in omega-3 fatty acids, but also include antioxidants and components called phytosterols.
From this research, Hardman suggests that, on the whole, individuals need to take in more of their fat calories from fats rich in omega-3 fatty acids and fewer fat calories from saturated fat or foods high in omega-6 fatty acids (corn and safflower oils).
Increasing your intake of omega-3 fatty-acid rich food such as walnuts, fish, canola and flaxseed oils, and/or omega-3 functional food is a good thing to do for breast cancer protection.
Breast cancer protection
Recently, in the American Journal of Epidemiology, it was shown that increased intake of vitamin D from the diet and from sunlight may reduce the risk of breast cancer by more than 20 percent.
Canadian researchers analyzed the vitamin-D intakes of 759 women with breast cancer and compared this to the vitamin-D intakes of 1,136 healthy controls.
Increased intakes of the sunshine vitamin were associated with a 24 per cent reduction in the risk of developing estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive tumours.
Moreover, increased intakes of vitamin D were also associated with 26 and 21 per cent reductions in the risk of receptor negative and mixed receptor tumours.
In addition, an evaluation of the data from the Women's Health Study examined calcium and vitamin D intake in relation to incidence of breast cancer in 10,578 pre-menopausal and 20,909 post-menopausal women.
Over an average of 10 years of follow-up, higher intakes of vitamin D and calcium were associated with a lower risk for pre-menopausal breast cancer.
Increasing your intake of vitamin D rich foods such as salmon, tuna, sardines, milk, margarine and vitamin D functional foods and/or taking a multivitamin with vitamin D is a good thing to do for breast cancer prevention.
Some types of breast cancer may also be related to the interaction between low folate intake and alcohol consumption.
An analysis of the Nurses Health Study reported the risk of breast cancer among post-menopausal females with low dietary folate intakes increased with any level of alcohol consumed.
In the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study, the risk of breast cancer was 25 per cent higher with alcohol consumption.
Epidemiologic studies support a positive association between a high intake of dietary folate and reduced breast cancer risk.
Increasing your intake of folic-rich foods such as green, leafy vegetables, asparagus, fortified breakfast cereals and orange juice is a good thing to do for breast cancer prevention.
In some epidemiological studies, the dietary soy intake of 5 grams of soy protein per day is associated with a modest protective effect in reducing the risk of developing breast cancer in both Western and Asian women.
Menopausal status and body mass index may alter the effects of soy on breast cancer risk, but it is difficult to conclude from the existing research. At this time, there is a lack of human intervention studies that directly examine the effects of soy on breast cancer risk.
Bottom Line
- Consume omega-3 fatty acid rich foods daily.
- Eat at least 7 to 8 servings of vegetables and fruits each day. Include at least one dark green vegetable daily.
- Take a multivitamin with vitamin D each day.
- Maintain a healthy weight and do physical activity daily. Enjoy 30 to 60 minutes of moderate activity each and every day.
--- Samara Felesky-Hunt
Samara Felesky-Hunt is a registered dietitian at The Downtown Sports Clinics in Calgary. Her column appears weekly in the Herald. She can be reached at dietitian-online.com
Article Source
However, for the one in nine Canadian women who will develop breast cancer in their lifetime, nutrition research continues to find answers in the area of prevention and protection and also in tumor reduction.
Dr. Elaine Hardman, a researcher at Marshall's Joan Edward School of Medicine, says "we are beginning to understand that diet probably contributes to one-third to two thirds of all cancer that develops."
Breast tumour reduction
Medicine is increasingly looking at dietary changes as a way to reduce cancer tumours. In a current issue of Nutrition and Cancer, for example, it's reported that walnut consumption suppressed tumour growth in animals compared to those following a typical American diet.
Researchers found that a diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids had an effect on cancer growth, as tumours took twice as long to double in size as tumours in the control group.
When animals were fed a diet in which 18.5 per cent of the daily calories came from walnuts, the equivalent of two servings for humans, the growth rate of the tumours was dramatically reduced.
Researchers concluded that walnuts have at least three components that could account for their cancer-slowing effect: they are high in omega-3 fatty acids, but also include antioxidants and components called phytosterols.
From this research, Hardman suggests that, on the whole, individuals need to take in more of their fat calories from fats rich in omega-3 fatty acids and fewer fat calories from saturated fat or foods high in omega-6 fatty acids (corn and safflower oils).
Increasing your intake of omega-3 fatty-acid rich food such as walnuts, fish, canola and flaxseed oils, and/or omega-3 functional food is a good thing to do for breast cancer protection.
Breast cancer protection
Recently, in the American Journal of Epidemiology, it was shown that increased intake of vitamin D from the diet and from sunlight may reduce the risk of breast cancer by more than 20 percent.
Canadian researchers analyzed the vitamin-D intakes of 759 women with breast cancer and compared this to the vitamin-D intakes of 1,136 healthy controls.
Increased intakes of the sunshine vitamin were associated with a 24 per cent reduction in the risk of developing estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive tumours.
Moreover, increased intakes of vitamin D were also associated with 26 and 21 per cent reductions in the risk of receptor negative and mixed receptor tumours.
In addition, an evaluation of the data from the Women's Health Study examined calcium and vitamin D intake in relation to incidence of breast cancer in 10,578 pre-menopausal and 20,909 post-menopausal women.
Over an average of 10 years of follow-up, higher intakes of vitamin D and calcium were associated with a lower risk for pre-menopausal breast cancer.
Increasing your intake of vitamin D rich foods such as salmon, tuna, sardines, milk, margarine and vitamin D functional foods and/or taking a multivitamin with vitamin D is a good thing to do for breast cancer prevention.
Some types of breast cancer may also be related to the interaction between low folate intake and alcohol consumption.
An analysis of the Nurses Health Study reported the risk of breast cancer among post-menopausal females with low dietary folate intakes increased with any level of alcohol consumed.
In the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study, the risk of breast cancer was 25 per cent higher with alcohol consumption.
Epidemiologic studies support a positive association between a high intake of dietary folate and reduced breast cancer risk.
Increasing your intake of folic-rich foods such as green, leafy vegetables, asparagus, fortified breakfast cereals and orange juice is a good thing to do for breast cancer prevention.
In some epidemiological studies, the dietary soy intake of 5 grams of soy protein per day is associated with a modest protective effect in reducing the risk of developing breast cancer in both Western and Asian women.
Menopausal status and body mass index may alter the effects of soy on breast cancer risk, but it is difficult to conclude from the existing research. At this time, there is a lack of human intervention studies that directly examine the effects of soy on breast cancer risk.
Bottom Line
- Consume omega-3 fatty acid rich foods daily.
- Eat at least 7 to 8 servings of vegetables and fruits each day. Include at least one dark green vegetable daily.
- Take a multivitamin with vitamin D each day.
- Maintain a healthy weight and do physical activity daily. Enjoy 30 to 60 minutes of moderate activity each and every day.
--- Samara Felesky-Hunt
Samara Felesky-Hunt is a registered dietitian at The Downtown Sports Clinics in Calgary. Her column appears weekly in the Herald. She can be reached at dietitian-online.com
Article Source
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Painkillers may reduce breast cancer risk: study
Painkillers such as Aspirin and ibuprofen may help reduce the risk of some breast cancers, but it's too soon to suggest taking the pills as a prevention strategy, according to a Canadian researcher who led the study.
Dr. Mahyar Etminan, a professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia and his colleagues at UBC and the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain, analyzed data from 38 observational studies involving more than 2.7 million women to see whether anti-inflammatory drugs reduced the risk of breast cancer.
It's thought that inflammation may be a risk factor in cancer, Etminan said. Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the value of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in reducing the risk of developing breast cancer, but by combining the results, reviewers aim to spot trends that individual studies may miss.
In Tuesday's online issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Etminan's team concluded that women who took any kind of NSAIDS regularly had a 12 per cent relative reduction in risk of developing breast cancer compared with those who didn't take the drugs.
In a separate analysis, those who took ibuprofen had a 21 per cent relative risk reduction, while those who took ASA showed a 12 per cent relative reduction, the researchers found.
Why does reducing inflammation help?
"The results are encouraging and may help us better understand the importance of role of inflammation in the pathology of the disease," Etminan said. "However, we don't recommend the routine use of NSAIDs for breast cancer prevention until large randomized trials confirm these findings. Results from an ongoing trial will be available in 2009."
Regular use of painkillers may cause serious side-effects such as ulcers and increased risk of stroke, so the potential benefits in terms of cancer risks would have to be weighed against the risk after the randomized trial is completed.
NSAIDS work by blocking two proteins that promote inflammation in the body. The proteins are also thought to drive the growth of tumours in three ways: disrupting how cells die, promoting blood vessels that fuel tumours, and affecting how the immune system responds when it detects cancer.
"This meta-analysis provides evidence that NSAID use is associated with reduced risk for breast cancer," the study's authors concluded. "Future research should include careful evaluation of the biologic mechanisms involved in the relationship between NSAIDs and breast cancer."
The review is limited in that participants are asked to remember what medications they took, and it's possible the researchers did not adjust for all factors linked with the reduced risk, such as healthier behaviour among those who took the pills.
In a journal editorial accompanying the study, Dr. Scott Lippman of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston pointed out that a woman's response to each NSAID may depend on her menopausal status and how hormone receptors are expressed in breast cells — factors that may also explain why observational studies have turned up conflicting results.
There are also other ways for women to reduce their risk of breast cancer by reducing inflammation, said Dr. Hal Gunn, head of Inspire Health, a government-funded holistic cancer care centre in Vancouver.
"We don't need to take antinflammatories to reduce inflammation in our body," Gunn said in an interview. "There are many natural ways that we can do that."
These include eating more fruits and vegetables, taking omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin D, eating the spice turmeric, drinking green tea, and avoiding stress, cigarettes and trans fat, Gunn said.
CBCnews Article Source
Dr. Mahyar Etminan, a professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia and his colleagues at UBC and the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain, analyzed data from 38 observational studies involving more than 2.7 million women to see whether anti-inflammatory drugs reduced the risk of breast cancer.
It's thought that inflammation may be a risk factor in cancer, Etminan said. Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the value of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in reducing the risk of developing breast cancer, but by combining the results, reviewers aim to spot trends that individual studies may miss.
In Tuesday's online issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Etminan's team concluded that women who took any kind of NSAIDS regularly had a 12 per cent relative reduction in risk of developing breast cancer compared with those who didn't take the drugs.
In a separate analysis, those who took ibuprofen had a 21 per cent relative risk reduction, while those who took ASA showed a 12 per cent relative reduction, the researchers found.
Why does reducing inflammation help?
"The results are encouraging and may help us better understand the importance of role of inflammation in the pathology of the disease," Etminan said. "However, we don't recommend the routine use of NSAIDs for breast cancer prevention until large randomized trials confirm these findings. Results from an ongoing trial will be available in 2009."
Regular use of painkillers may cause serious side-effects such as ulcers and increased risk of stroke, so the potential benefits in terms of cancer risks would have to be weighed against the risk after the randomized trial is completed.
NSAIDS work by blocking two proteins that promote inflammation in the body. The proteins are also thought to drive the growth of tumours in three ways: disrupting how cells die, promoting blood vessels that fuel tumours, and affecting how the immune system responds when it detects cancer.
"This meta-analysis provides evidence that NSAID use is associated with reduced risk for breast cancer," the study's authors concluded. "Future research should include careful evaluation of the biologic mechanisms involved in the relationship between NSAIDs and breast cancer."
The review is limited in that participants are asked to remember what medications they took, and it's possible the researchers did not adjust for all factors linked with the reduced risk, such as healthier behaviour among those who took the pills.
In a journal editorial accompanying the study, Dr. Scott Lippman of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston pointed out that a woman's response to each NSAID may depend on her menopausal status and how hormone receptors are expressed in breast cells — factors that may also explain why observational studies have turned up conflicting results.
There are also other ways for women to reduce their risk of breast cancer by reducing inflammation, said Dr. Hal Gunn, head of Inspire Health, a government-funded holistic cancer care centre in Vancouver.
"We don't need to take antinflammatories to reduce inflammation in our body," Gunn said in an interview. "There are many natural ways that we can do that."
These include eating more fruits and vegetables, taking omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin D, eating the spice turmeric, drinking green tea, and avoiding stress, cigarettes and trans fat, Gunn said.
CBCnews Article Source
Monday, October 6, 2008
Breast cancer vaccine is possible, says expert
A vaccine to prevent breast cancer is a realistic prospect, but more research is vital if it is to be achieved, according to a leading expert.
By Aislinn Simpson Last Updated: 7:54AM BST 06 Oct 2008
Professor Valerie Beral of Oxford University, who leads the Million Women's Study into the causes of the disease, said her research had already proven beyond doubt that childbirth and the act of breastfeeding prevents breast cancer.
She wants scientists to look more closely at how they could mimic the hormones associated with childbirth and rearing in a bid to stamp out the disease, instead of trying to cure it once it has developed, as is mostly the case at present.
She pointed out that while death rates have been dramatically reduced by new drugs and earlier diagnosis, the number of women developing breast cancer and having to go through traumatic surgery and chemotherapy was rising.
She said it was impossible to return to an era where all women had babies and breastfed for longer periods of time, but added: "Why aren't we thinking of mimicking the effects of childbirth?
"We don't know how this happens and nobody is doing research on it. We should be looking at hormone production during late pregnancy and lactation."
Prof Beral's Cancer Research UK-funded work as the director of the cancer epidemiology unit of Oxford University sees her use large ammounts of statistical data to establish trends in why women develop the disease.
Speaking at the National Cancer Research Institute's annual conference, she queried why the avenue of breast cancer prevention which might lead to a drug or vaccine was not being pursued.
She pointed to the example of cervical cancer, where most cases were found to be caused by the humanpapilloma virus, and the development of a vaccine which is now being given to schoolgirls aged 12 and 13.
But "fewer than a dozen people" are looking in this direction with regard to breast cancer, she said, despite the likelihood that anyone who made the breakthrough would almost certainly win the Nobel Prize.
"It is not well-funded. It is not mainstream research. Why isn't it a priority of the cancer community?" she said.
Dr Jane Cope, director of the National Cancer Research Institute, said it too wanted to boost research into prevention.
"Research into breast cancer has been a great success story, with survival rates at an all-time high," she said.
"However, the number of women diagnosed with the disease is increasing year after year.
"Preventing all types of cancer is now an exciting prospect for researchers in the UK."
Article Source
By Aislinn Simpson Last Updated: 7:54AM BST 06 Oct 2008
Professor Valerie Beral of Oxford University, who leads the Million Women's Study into the causes of the disease, said her research had already proven beyond doubt that childbirth and the act of breastfeeding prevents breast cancer.
She wants scientists to look more closely at how they could mimic the hormones associated with childbirth and rearing in a bid to stamp out the disease, instead of trying to cure it once it has developed, as is mostly the case at present.
She pointed out that while death rates have been dramatically reduced by new drugs and earlier diagnosis, the number of women developing breast cancer and having to go through traumatic surgery and chemotherapy was rising.
She said it was impossible to return to an era where all women had babies and breastfed for longer periods of time, but added: "Why aren't we thinking of mimicking the effects of childbirth?
"We don't know how this happens and nobody is doing research on it. We should be looking at hormone production during late pregnancy and lactation."
Prof Beral's Cancer Research UK-funded work as the director of the cancer epidemiology unit of Oxford University sees her use large ammounts of statistical data to establish trends in why women develop the disease.
Speaking at the National Cancer Research Institute's annual conference, she queried why the avenue of breast cancer prevention which might lead to a drug or vaccine was not being pursued.
She pointed to the example of cervical cancer, where most cases were found to be caused by the humanpapilloma virus, and the development of a vaccine which is now being given to schoolgirls aged 12 and 13.
But "fewer than a dozen people" are looking in this direction with regard to breast cancer, she said, despite the likelihood that anyone who made the breakthrough would almost certainly win the Nobel Prize.
"It is not well-funded. It is not mainstream research. Why isn't it a priority of the cancer community?" she said.
Dr Jane Cope, director of the National Cancer Research Institute, said it too wanted to boost research into prevention.
"Research into breast cancer has been a great success story, with survival rates at an all-time high," she said.
"However, the number of women diagnosed with the disease is increasing year after year.
"Preventing all types of cancer is now an exciting prospect for researchers in the UK."
Article Source
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Passionately pink for breast cancer cure
Passionately pink for breast cancer cure
By MONA LOCKEGUEST
As we all watch Wall Street and wonder how the numbers will affect our lives, here are some other numbers to consider as we observe National Breast Cancer Awareness Month.
Ninety-eight: The percentage of a woman's chance of surviving breast cancer if it is caught early. We've made tremendous strides in the fight against breast cancer. With billions of dollars invested in research and awareness education, and millions of survivors around the world, we can feel proud of our progress and hopeful for the future -- but we still have a long way to go.
Twenty-eight: Our state's current rank in the nation for the number of women who receive regular mammograms, the very thing that can turn a victim into a survivor. For women who receive an annual mammogram, the test can detect tumors long before they are big enough to feel. Yet, about one in four women fail to receive a mammogram each year. Many women simply forget to schedule it, causing another year to pass by. For others the reason is a bit more significant. More than 46,000 women in Washington cannot afford a mammogram. The risk of dying from breast cancer increases 30 percent to 50 percent for women who are uninsured.
Eleven: The number of families in Washington each day who find out they must face this disease. Washington is one of the top three states in the nation with the highest rate of breast cancer. The Puget Sound Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure helps fund the Washington Breast and Cervical Health Program, which provides no-cost mammograms to low-income and uninsured women between the ages of 40-64.
One: The number of people it takes to save a life. Schedule your mammogram today. Remind your mother, sisters, daughters and friends to do the same. This October in support of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, we have partnered with Gene Juarez Salons & Spas to offer mammography screenings at Gene Juarez locations throughout the Northwest. No-cost screenings are available for uninsured women with limited incomes. To schedule an appointment, find out more information about WBCHP, call 800-756-5437.
Bottom line -- mammograms save lives.
Take it one step further and go pink this October to help us spread the word about the
effectiveness of mammograms while raising funds to help those in your community. Participate in "Passionately Pink for the Cure," a grassroots program in which companies, organizations or individuals pick a day to wear pink to raise awareness for breast cancer. Visit passionatelypink.org to receive a free participation kit to help organize your own Passionately Pink for a Cure day.
We thank KING-TV, KOMO/4, KCPQ/13 and KIRO/7 for celebrating "Passionately Pink for the Cure" by asking their television anchors and on-air talent to wear pink on Thursday during their newscasts in solidarity for Susan G. Komen for the Cure and breast cancer awareness month.
We are fighting every minute of every day to end breast cancer forever. Please join us in the fight. Pick your pink. Play your part. End breast cancer forever.
Mona Locke is executive director of the Puget Sound affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Article Source
By MONA LOCKEGUEST
As we all watch Wall Street and wonder how the numbers will affect our lives, here are some other numbers to consider as we observe National Breast Cancer Awareness Month.
Ninety-eight: The percentage of a woman's chance of surviving breast cancer if it is caught early. We've made tremendous strides in the fight against breast cancer. With billions of dollars invested in research and awareness education, and millions of survivors around the world, we can feel proud of our progress and hopeful for the future -- but we still have a long way to go.
Twenty-eight: Our state's current rank in the nation for the number of women who receive regular mammograms, the very thing that can turn a victim into a survivor. For women who receive an annual mammogram, the test can detect tumors long before they are big enough to feel. Yet, about one in four women fail to receive a mammogram each year. Many women simply forget to schedule it, causing another year to pass by. For others the reason is a bit more significant. More than 46,000 women in Washington cannot afford a mammogram. The risk of dying from breast cancer increases 30 percent to 50 percent for women who are uninsured.
Eleven: The number of families in Washington each day who find out they must face this disease. Washington is one of the top three states in the nation with the highest rate of breast cancer. The Puget Sound Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure helps fund the Washington Breast and Cervical Health Program, which provides no-cost mammograms to low-income and uninsured women between the ages of 40-64.
One: The number of people it takes to save a life. Schedule your mammogram today. Remind your mother, sisters, daughters and friends to do the same. This October in support of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, we have partnered with Gene Juarez Salons & Spas to offer mammography screenings at Gene Juarez locations throughout the Northwest. No-cost screenings are available for uninsured women with limited incomes. To schedule an appointment, find out more information about WBCHP, call 800-756-5437.
Bottom line -- mammograms save lives.
Take it one step further and go pink this October to help us spread the word about the
effectiveness of mammograms while raising funds to help those in your community. Participate in "Passionately Pink for the Cure," a grassroots program in which companies, organizations or individuals pick a day to wear pink to raise awareness for breast cancer. Visit passionatelypink.org to receive a free participation kit to help organize your own Passionately Pink for a Cure day.
We thank KING-TV, KOMO/4, KCPQ/13 and KIRO/7 for celebrating "Passionately Pink for the Cure" by asking their television anchors and on-air talent to wear pink on Thursday during their newscasts in solidarity for Susan G. Komen for the Cure and breast cancer awareness month.
We are fighting every minute of every day to end breast cancer forever. Please join us in the fight. Pick your pink. Play your part. End breast cancer forever.
Mona Locke is executive director of the Puget Sound affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Article Source
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)